Dodge Journey – The Car Exam Extended Test

Dodge Journey – Consumer and Car Exam

Dodge Journey – The Car Exam Extended Test

Dodge Journey – front – Consumer and Car Exam

The 2016 Dodge Journey SXT is a mixed bag of sorts; it has some good attributes, yet it also has some that truly make it less of a CUV than it ultimately could be. First: the good points…

Dodge Journey – rear – Consumer and Car Exam

…The 2016 Dodge Journey’s 3.6L, 283 hp V6 engine pulls strong and fast–it’s no slouch, even pulling such a heavy vehicle. Cornering on mountains roads yields no noticeable body roll at all, and the dash layout, for the most part is good. The UConnect Stereo system takes some getting used to, especially with some of the controls on the backside of the steering wheel, but the sound coming from it is terrific. The overall ride is also good; the suspension soaks up most bumps and imperfections with ease, without feeling too firm or too soft–a nice feat in such a vehicle. The six-speed automatic transmission works smoothly with the V6, never feeling unsettled at all. The second row of rear seats
are relatively comfortable, and have a good of amount of legroom for passengers. Rear passengers also have their own climate control buttons, a nice touch. Overall, the quality of the interior materials seem very good.

Dodge Journey – rear seats – Consumer and Car Exam

Dodge Journey – 3.6L V6 – Consumer and Car Exam

Now for the not-so-good aspects of the 2016 Dodge Journey: The driver’s seatback is horribly uncomfortable. The non-adjustable seat bolster protrudes out too far, as does the headrest. While the part of the seat where your bottom goes seems just fine, the rest of the seat is terrible, and makes for poor posture when sitting up as straight as possible.

Dodge Journey – front seats – Consumer and Car Exam

The braking is just okay…not horribly bad, not great, but just okay. The blind spots in the rears are bothersome, just as side rearview mirror on the driver’s side seems shaped just a bit too tall and square. The Car Exam had issues with the windshield wipers coming on during engaging of the turn signals, a definite annoyance. For some reason, the design in that regard is very poor. The climate control system, while good, could be much simpler to operate. It’s too complicated (except for the on/off control) to operate at a glance easily, so great care must be taken.

Dodge Journey – dash – Consumer and Car Exam

The 3rd row of rear seats are not meant for adults–at all. They are far too small and cramped. The rear load floor is also somewhat high for a vehicle that sits as high as the Journey does, but at least it folds flat, along with the 2nd row of seats. Fuel economy wasn’t the greatest in the Journey, as it really seemed to drink up the fuel (at least when it wasn’t going downhill). 16 to 18 mpg seemed to be the norm in the 2016 Dodge Journey. The steering seems to be over-boosted a bit too much, taking some of the fun factor away from the driving experience.

Dodge Journey – 3rd row seats – Consumer and Car Exam

Dodge Journey – rear cargo area – Consumer and Car Exam

Finally, while Consumer and Car Exam was on its extended road test, only one other Journey was spotted in almost 400 miles of driving–yikes. It’s not a very popular or high-selling vehicle, and sadly, Consumer and Car Exam sees why. Along with its other flaws, the 2016 Journey doesn’t really standout style-wise, either. Don’t even try parking it in tight spots–it’s very difficult to do so.

Dodge Journey – Consumer and Car Exam

The Car Exam’s final grade for the 2016 Dodge Journey is a “C” grade. The Journey could be so much better, but it’s not. The Journey may not be in the Dodge lineup very much longer, and it’s a shame FCA couldn’t have made the entire package more appealing to consumers.

2016 Dodge Journey SXT Starting M.S.R.P.: $24,895

©2008-2016 T.C.E. and Consumer and Car Exam. No material from this site may be used without permission of T.C.E. and Consumer and Car Exam

 

Chevrolet Impala – The Car Exam Review

Chevrolet Impala – Consumer and Car Exam

2016 Chevrolet Impala – An Impressive American Sedan – Consumer and Car Exam

Chevrolet Impala – Consumer and Car Exam

Good grades: the 2016 Chevrolet Impala has impressive styling, both inside and out. Its sleek, modern, beautiful styling no longer says “rental car special.” Interior room, ergonomics, and comfort are cavernous. The quality of materials in the Impala are not cheap and flimsy like GM cars of the 1990’s–they’re very nice, and the seats in the Chevy Impala–both front and rear–are very comfortable with lots of room for passengers to stretch out and relax. The trunk is also extremely large, with enough room to gobble up plenty of gear on a long road trip. The stereo system in the 2016 Chevy Impala also sounds fantastic. Even if you don’t use it, you are treated to a nice, quiet ride.

Engine power on the 305 hp, 264 lb-ft. of torque, 3.6L V6 engine is strong and well tuned for the six-speed automatic transmission, and the overall driving dynamics (as well as the build quality) do not disappoint. Braking and handling are also exceptional on the Impala.

Chevrolet Impala – Consumer and Car Exam

Bad Grades: there’s very little to complain about here: the rear blind spots might be too much for some, especially shorter adults; also, the starting price of the Impala may be a bit much for some prospective shoppers: the 2LT trim has a starting MSRP of $30,435, while a base Impala starts at $27,095. The price goes up even more from there, and there are many people not wanting to spent that kind of cash on an Impala.

Chevrolet Impala – Consumer and Car Exam

Chevrolet Impala – Consumer and Car Exam

Final Grade: The Car Exam gives the 2016 Chevrolet Impala a solid “A” grade. It’s one of the best-driving and impressive American sedans Consumer and Car Exam has ever tested, and it’s a job well-done by Chevy and GM. If reliability is just as impressive, GM has a real winner on its hands.

2016 Chevrolet Impala – Consumer and Car Exam

All reviews, photos and stories ©2008-2016 Consumer and Car Exam and T.C.E. No material from this site may used without the permission of Consumer and Car Exam and T.C.E.

Ford Fiesta – Extended Test – The Car Exam

Ford Fiesta – Consumer and Car Exam

2015 Ford Fiesta SE Hatchback Extended Test – The Car Exam

Good Grades: The Fiesta is a good transportation car–it gets decent fuel economy (28 CITY, 36 HWY–mileage seemed to vary wildly on the first leg of The Car Exam’s extended test-it was mostly downhill, and highway mileage was worse going than it was returning up some very hilly roads), engine power is somewhat adequate (120 horsepower, and 112 lb. ft. of torque)–the six-speed dual clutch automatic transmission works generally well with the engine, but the 2015 Fiesta is no speedster. If it were not for the sixth speed in the transmission, the acceleration would be much worse. Passing attempts take some pre-thought, which is a bummer-you want instant power, not delayed power. The brakes work just fine, it handles corners confidently, the ride is acceptable (not too harsh, not too soft) and the driver’s seat is comfortable. The seats work well for long trips, just like the one The Car Exam took with the 2015 Ford Fiesta. It feels like a solidly-built car–it doesn’t feel cheap and tinny. The Aston-Martin-like front end styling Ford has adopted on many of its vehicles in recent years works especially well here on the Fiesta, as it does on the Fusion and the Focus. Also, the blind spot mirrors are a nice and welcome safety touch on the Fiesta-all cars should have them.

Ford Fiesta – Consumer and Car Exam

Ford Fiesta – Consumer and Car Exam

Ford Fiesta – Consumer and Car Exam

Bad Grades: There is no rear leg room in the back seats (entry and exit into the back seats is also difficult); the cargo capacity–even with the rear seats folded town is terrible (the photos provided show exactly that-many other cars in its class are far roomier), the stereo is complex and has far too many buttons (very small buttons–forget trying to adjust the stereo properly when you’re driving-if you want it done right, it isn’t going to happen with the puzzle of buttons. Please, simplify this, Ford!) and it isn’t easy to use at all (which is too bad, because it sounds good), rear visibility is subpar, and watch your head when getting into the front and back seats–it’s easy to hit your head on the roof–and it hurts!

Ford Fiesta – Consumer and Car Exam

Ford Fiesta – Dash – Consumer and Car Exam

Ford Fiesta – rear seats- Consumer and Car Exam

Final Grade: The 2015 Ford Fiesta SE Hatchback (even though it’s a very nice-looking car-one of the best looking in its class) needs a well-conceived redesign to get it right–it only earns a “C” grade. Ford is building better cars than before, but the Fiesta has too many crucial and functional shortcomings–and those flaws make it much less competitive than other subcompact cars in its class. The Fiesta should be due for a total redesign soon, and hopefully Ford will make the Fiesta worthy of an “A” grade. It has the ability to do as such, and with some careful and intuitive thought, Ford can redo the Fiesta successfully.

Ford Fiesta

Ford Fiesta – Consumer and Car Exam

Ford Fiesta

2015 Ford Fiesta SE Hatchback Base Price (as tested): $15,595

Kia Optima – 2015 Extended Test Revisited – Consumer and Car Exam

2015 Kia Optima

2015 Kia Optima SX and LX…revisiting one of Consumer and Car Exam’s most popular reviews

Plusses: The 2015 Kia Optima SX Limited is a nice, well-balanced car. The Optima’s ride is near-perfect, the interior is comfortable (and roomy), interior materials feel upscale, and the dash design is superb. Cloth materials in the base Optima LX are acceptable, as well. The 2.0 liter, Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI), 274 horsepower, turbocharged four cylinder engine is powerful, slick, and very smooth–no turbo lag was detected at all–this is the smoothest turbocharged engine Consumer and Car Exam Has ever tested. Braking feels good as well. The brakes also stop promptly in the Optima LX.

The non-turbo engine in our recent extended test base model Optima accelerated very well, too; it puts out a strong 192 horsepower and 181 lb-ft of torque. Acceleration is not lacking in either model tested. The trunk is large—cavernous, and it can hold a lot of items. The base suspension on the Optima LX is softer, so it doesn’t handle with the same vigor as the sport-tuned suspension on the SX Limited. Nevertheless, the base LX suspension does a great job of soaking up bumps in the road—it definitely serves its purpose for typical driving here.

2015 Kia Optima

This fully-loaded test model had navigation, rear camera, blind spot detection and much more; the safety features on the Optima are impressive. 34 mpg on the highway also impresses, and the six-speed automatic transmission will not disappoint most drivers; however, there is another caveat about rearward visibility in the upcoming minuses section…The stereo in the Kia Optima LX also has a good sound, with very strong bass tones to spice up the sound if you want to.

2015 Kia Optima

Minuses: The c-pillar design on the roof creates a blind spot, but the blind spot detection system can help compensate for that. Now, the other rearward visibility caveat: the high rear deck lid (and steeply-sloping rear window) makes rear visibility difficult; on the extended test base model Optima LX recently driven, two of the three rear headrests had to be removed to improve the rearward view. The high deck lid could be a problem for short drivers. Any kind of moderately-spirited driving means poor gas mileage (at least in the base LX, fuel economy tanks badly), so one needs to be careful when driving the Optima.

2015 Kia Optima

Final Grade: This is one of the best all-around, mid-sized sedans on the market today–and most worthy of Consumer and Car Exam’s final grade of “A/A+”…Well done, Kia–well done, and the all-new 2016 Kia Optima will hopefully be a winner, too.

2015 Kia Optima

Honda Fit – The Car Exam

Honda Fit – The Car Exam

2015 Honda Fit: Somewhat Better…But Far From Perfect

Good Grades: The styling on the 2015 Honda Fit is an improvement. It looks sleeker and more up-to-date. No longer available in Base/Sport Trims, they are designated as: LX, EX, EX-L, and EX-L/with Navigation. The new base model is the LX, which The Car Exam tested. It now packs 130 horsepower, 13 more than the 2013 model. It’s mated to a CVT automatic transmission, which gives the Fit all around better fuel economy in the city and on the highway (33 CITY 41 HWY, 2015 vs. 28 CITY 35 HWY, 2013). Braking and steering in the 2015 Honda Fit are also just fine. The interior quality is better than the 2009-13 Fit–it looks more upscale. The Magic Seats in the 2015 Honda Fit are still there, which is a great thing–and the load floor to the rear hatch is still nice and flat. Those qualities keep cargo hauling easier than every other car in its class. There’s an outside temperature gauge now, something sorely missing from the last generation Fit, and the USB auxiliary input is now exposed in a convenient place close to the driver.

 

Honda Fit – The Car Exam

Bad Grades: The 2015 Honda Fit comes up short in a number of areas: handling is not as crisp as it is in the 2013 model; it provides a softer ride, but cornering ability suffers. The 2009-13 feels like a taut and fun–the 2015 Fit doesn’t. The new Fit has more engine horsepower, but it still strains and it’s loud and booming, worse than the old Fit. What happened to the additional sound insulation, Honda? It’s inexcusable for the new Fit to be so noisy.

Honda Fit

The new Fit loses about 4 cubic feet in cargo room to help allow for more rear leg room, and it’s a noticeable trade-off. The Fit LX gets a stereo with a volume control knob–great–but every other trim has an odd touch control for the volume, and it works poorly. Most drivers will need to adjust the volume from the steering wheel to do it safely. What’s worse, Honda is using that same flawed volume control on more of its new cars–a very bad thing. The 2015 Fit also loses the top storage in the dash, which is too bad.

Honda Fit – The Car Exam

Final Grade: The Fit earns a “B” grade–there’s definitely much room for improvement. There are more than enough fixable flaws with the 2015 Fit to prevent it from earning a better grade. It’s better in some areas, but it can be a lot better in others. If you go with the Fit, know what you’re getting–take an extended test drive before you decide.

Honda Fit – The Car Exam

 

2015 Honda Fit LX (as tested, MSRP): $16,450.00

 

Ford Fiesta – The Car Exam

Ford Fiesta – The Car Exam

Ford Fiesta SE Hatchback Quick Test

Good Grades: The Fiesta is a good transportation car–it gets decent fuel economy (28 CITY, 36 HWY), engine power is adequate (120 horsepower, and 112 lb. ft. of torque)–the six-speed dual clutch automatic transmission works generally well with the engine, the brakes work fine, it handles corners confidently, the ride is acceptable (not too harsh, not too soft) and the driver’s seat is comfortable. It feels like a solidly-built car–it doesn’t feel cheap and tinny. The Aston-Martin-like front end styling Ford has adopted on many of its vehicles in recent years works especially well here on the Fiesta, as it does on the Fusion and the Focus.

Ford Fiesta – The Car Exam

Bad Grades: There is no rear leg room in the back seats (entry and exit into the back seats is also difficult); the cargo capacity–even with the rear seats folded town is terrible (many other cars in its class are far roomier), the stereo is complex and has far too many buttons (very small buttons) and it isn’t easy to use at all (which is too bad, because it sounds good), rear visibility is subpar, and watch your head when getting into the front and back seats–it’s easy to hit your head on the roof–and it hurts!

 

Final Grade: The Fiesta (even though it’s a very nice-looking car) needs a well-conceived redesign to get it right–it only earns a “C” grade. Ford is building better cars than before, but the Fiesta has too many crucial and functional shortcomings–and those flaws make it much less competitive than other subcompact cars in its class.

 

Ford Fiesta – The Car Exam

 

2015 Ford Fiesta SE Hatchback Base Price (as tested): $15,595

 

SUV – Truck –  Auto Exam and News ©2008-2015 The Car Exam and C&CE

Dodge Challenger R/T – The Car Exam

Dodge Challenger (2015) R/T Scat Pack – Front

2015 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack: Super American Muscle

Plusses: 6.4 liters, 485 horsepower of pure Hemi V8 muscle–the Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack model is so fast, it will have you asking yourself, “Do I need this much horsepower? Really?” You may not need it all the time, but if you need to merge onto the highway or pass another vehicle, you’ll answer “Heck yes!” with a huge grin on your face. The rapid acceleration will press you against your seat instantly. The eight-speed automatic transmission works seemlessly with the 6.4 liter V8 engine. The Challenger shares the same platform as the Dodge Charger and the Chrysler 300, which means interior space is great for an American muscle these days (the Challenger even has a good amount of useable trunk space, although the lift-over is high). The Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro aren’t even close in that department.

Dodge Challenger (2015) Front and Side View

2015 Challenger – Trunk

The seats are top notch and comfortable, both in front and in back; the revised dash is light years better than the one in the 2014 models, and the touchscreen infotainment system is great–seeing the performance information (horsepower, torque, etc.) displayed on the screen is a terrific idea, and it can even be entertaining for passengers. The performance suspension has a ride the is acceptable, which is quite a surprise. The Challenger Scat Pack even has some nifty safety features on board (forward collision warning, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and a rear backup camera for good measure). The 2015 Dodge Challenger also has classic good looks going for it also–it’s the total package.

Dodge Challenger – Dash and Front Seats

Challenger Dash 1

Challenger Dash 2

Minuses: You’ll pay dearly at the gas pump for all that horsepower–the Challenger’s poor fuel economy won’t win any awards for frugalness (E.P.A. rated 14 mpg city, 23 mpg highway). The huge blind spots from the rear “C” pillars hamper visibility. It also make rear seat passengers feel claustrophobic, in spite of the spacious rear seat.

2015 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack

Final Grade: if you can afford the mid-$40,000 price of the 2015 Dodge Challenger Scat Pack (Consumer and Car Exam’s tester model), then go for it. This car will most likely become a collectible classic in the future. Do you need to buy the more expensive, Dodge Challenger SRT 392 model–or the even more expensive 707 hp Hemi Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat? No! The Scat Pack Challenger will do the job with no problem. The updated and improved Dodge Challenger is a fantastic piece of American muscle, and a thrill ride driving enthusiasts should experience at least once–actually, as many times as they possibly can. Even if some consumers can’t spend (or don’t want to) the extra cash for the Scat Pack Challenger, they still have the 5.7 liter, 375 hp, Hemi V8 R/T and 3.6 liter, 305 hp Pentastar V6 SXT models to choose from–decisions, decisions…

The Car Exam’s Grade: a strong “A” grade

Dodge Challenger (2015) – R/T and Base Models

Dodge Challenger (2015) Rear

Toyota Corolla LE Extended Test – The Car Exam

Toyota Corolla

Plusses: The 2014 Toyota Corolla LE has far more rear seat room than the 2014 model it replaced; it almost feels cavernous. Back seat passengers will be happy. It’s also clear to see why Toyota went with the CVT transmission now–it utilizes the power from the 1.8 liter 4 cylinder engine far better and more efficiently, making it accelerate faster (especially up long grades in the mountains) and also making the Corolla more fuel efficient (too bad the base models are still stuck with the outdated 4-speed automatic transmission). It’s not perfect, but the CVT Transmission does it’s job very well.

The Corolla LE has a soft, comfortable ride, soaks up bumps well and while it isn’t made for twisty roads and sharp handling, the suspension is acceptable, as are the brakes. The sounds system is good–a bit tedious to operate, though, and the back up camera is a nice touch, just be very careful not to over-calculate how close you are to another vehicle or object, because the camera’s lines on the screen seem a bit off, measurement-wise.

Minuses: the large, annoying, cinder block-styled dashboard is annoying and claustrophobic. It hurts outward visibility, as does the high rear deck lid. Speaking of which, the truck opening is too narrow, a common problem on most sedans these days, unfortunately. The rear seat headrests are not removable, which is inexcusable. If you have no rear seat passengers, and the driver wishes to remove the rear headrests for better visibility (which the driver would be happy to have, because the high position of the truck cuts rearward visibility out of the back window), then you’re out of luck. Toyota didn’t do this with at least the two previous generations of the Corolla, but it does now–and it feels like a cheap touch–not good, Toyota). Interior materials are better than the 2013 Corolla, but too much cheap plastic still remains.

Final Grade: that annoying dashboard, along with some other minor issues prompts The Car Exam to give the 2014 Corolla LE a “B” grade: if Toyota gets rid of that horribly annoying dashboard, the Corolla would have earn a top “A” grade for sure, because there’s a lot to like about the 2014-2015 Corollas.

Kia Sedona Review Coming Soon

Kia Sedona

Consumer and Car Exam’s review of the 2015 Kia Sedona is coming soon! How does it drive? Stay tuned to Consumer and Car Exam to find out! More Car and Food reviews are coming up, as well!

Kia Forte LX – 2015 Extended Test

Kia Forte LX

Kia Forte LX – 2015 Extended Test – Consumer and Car Exam

Plusses: Comfortable seats (front and rear), front and rear leg room is excellent, a comfortable ride–the suspension soaks up most bumps easily; the interior ergonomics are on target–the radio and H/VAC controls are close to the driver and easy to read. The gauges are easy to read as well. The Forte has good trunk room. The stereo has good sound overall, and once you learn how to navigate it and play mp3/wma files, it is quite simple to use.

Kia Forte – Dash

Also, the 2.0 liter 4 cylinder engine has good low end power, the six-speed transmission shifts smoothly, and the brakes do a good job of stopping the Forte without hassle. The sun visors actually work–both for the windshield and the side windows–they are long and just the right length, unlike a lot of cars today. The exterior styling isn’t ground-breaking, but it doesn’t offend. It’s a decent looking car.

Minuses: The Kia’s acceleration seems to lag at higher speeds; by comparison, the 2014 Toyota Corolla tested just before the Forte did a far better job–with less horsepower. The CVT in the Corolla takes better advantage of its engine’s power band than the Kia’s engine/transmission combo. It required more shifting climbing steep grades than the Corolla, which handles that task with precision. The high rear deck lid cuts some rearward visibility, but the visibility out of the other windows in the car is just fine.

The soft suspension makes for a comfortable ride, but it isn’t sporty enough to go around twisty roads vigorously. In other words, it doesn’t feel “athletic.” Fuel economy is acceptable; slower driving is rewarded with better gas mileage. If you have a lead foot, it will drink gas as fast a thirsty dog drinks cool water on a hot summer day. It read color of the stereo display is a somewhat of a turn-off, just as they are in the Kia Soul and other Kia models.

Final Grade: it earns a solid “A-/B+” grade. The 2015 Kia Forte LX is a good commuter car that will work just a nicely as a long road trip car. The Car Exam’s extended test of the Forte was a good one–it was a solid feeling, comfortable car. It put many other compact (and mid-sized cars) to shame. The only thing missing was a sunroof, which can be had on higher-end Forte models. It lacks the “herky-jerky” transmission found in the Ford Focus, and the “cinder block in-your-face” dashboard found in the Toyota Corolla.

Kia Forte

If the Forte is reliable, then it will be money well-spent by consumers choosing to purchase it. If it were more fun to drive, and the engine had better high end acceleration, it would score even higher. The Kia Forte is just as good as its platform mate, the Hyundai Elantra, and worth consideration to buy for anyone looking for an affordable sedan (or even hatchback–the Forte 5).

Kia Forte – 2015

Kia Forte